-40%

1969 Trail Bike Motorcycle Comparison Test - 6-Page Vintage Article

$ 7.6

Availability: 58 in stock
  • Condition: Original vintage magazine advertisement / article. Condition: Good

    Description

    1969 Trail Bike Motorcycle Comparison Test - 6-Page Vintage Article
    Original, vintage magazine advertisement / article.
    Page Size: Approx. 8" x 11" (21 cm x 28 cm)
    Condition: Good
    A LONG LOOK AT HONDA, YAMAHA, SUZUKI, AND HODAKA'S TRAIL MACHINES
    By Robert Schleicher
    The very concept of a “trailbike”
    makes it difficult to evaluate. Here is a
    motorcycle that is supposed to per-
    form well at both low arid high speeds
    in rough country, while still maintain-
    ing some capabilities for in-town street
    cruising. These three concepts, low
    speed dirt travel, high speed dirt travel
    and in-town transport are NOT fully
    compatible. At best, then, the trailbike
    is a compromise vehicle. Among the
    four trailbikes we tested were indivi-
    dual machines that truly excelled in
    ONE of each of these categories. If
    you know, in advance of the purchase
    of a trailbike, which of these three
    areas will constitute most of your
    trailbike trips, your choice can be
    relatively easy—most of us will mix all
    three in near-equal amounts—if not in
    our own riding needs, then in the
    riding needs of other members of the
    family or friends who will use the
    machine. We will try to give you our
    personal views of how each of these
    four most popular trailbikes meets the
    most compromising demands of the
    multi-purpose trailbike.
    Few individual riders will thrash
    their trailbikes as badly as we did these
    four motorcycles. In all, four men
    rode each bike for a period, logging
    over 200 very dirty miles. Two of us
    were current or ex-desert/sera mb les
    riders of both full-size motorcycles
    and trailbike class dirt racers, one rider
    was a newcomer to dirt trailbike desert
    racing, and the fourth rider had never
    had a machine off the road. The
    experienced dirt riders among our
    group were fully capable of extracting
    more from these machines than the
    “average” buyer would ever find,
    while the “newcomer” demanded the
    expected “forgivingness” of his
    mounts that a new rider is entitled to.
    46
    Each of the four motorcycles was
    subjected to 40-50 mph cross-country
    racing across the Southern California
    Mojave desert with the unavoidable
    high speed jumps and “wheelies” that
    these speeds entail. Each of the bikes
    was drifted about an improvised (and
    bumpy) % mile oval dirt track, ridden
    at maximum speeds down washboard
    and twisty dirt roads, threaded up and
    down the mountain goat-type trails
    that one would find in mountainous
    territory, and cruised about in-town
    paved streets. Most trailbike buyers
    will consider the dirt-racing antics ridi-
    culous, for they consider their trail-
    bikes to be little more than motorized
    packmules to carry them and their
    hunting, fishing, and/or camping gear
    over trackless terrain. Eventually, any
    cross country rider will be faced with a
    long trip over the boonies, and few
    will be able to resist the temptation to
    Trail
    Bikes
    on
    Trial
    cover the flatter and less interesting
    stretches at relatively high speed—a
    trailbike should at least be able to
    cover ground at a near-racing speed
    without trying to unload its rider at
    every rut, hump, or soft spot. The
    trailbike is a sports machine, and, as
    such, it should always have a bit of
    inherent forgivingness in its design to
    help its rider out of unexpected
    trouble in the form of sudden changes
    in the terrain—we simply created an
    extra large measure of these “trouble”
    situations by riding each of the bikes
    at cross-country speeds a bit above the
    capabilities of any such compromise
    vehicle.
    We established twelve general cate-
    gories of performance and mechanical
    specifications to use as criteria for
    comparing and evaluating each of the
    four trailbikes in relation to one an-
    other: engine low end torque, spread
    Honda CL-90 is more of street road-
    ster with dirt looks than a true trail-
    bike, but overlay sprocket and wider,
    knobbier, tires would transform bike
    into one of the best for cross-country
    riding.
    Hodaka Ace 100 features a five-speed
    transmission, is most comfortable of
    the four bikes tested. Pad on luggage
    rack is dealer-installed option as is
    knobby rear tire. Bike was tested with
    "K70" tire.
    Yamaha L5- T had excel ten t po wer and
    torque, far beyond its factory rating,
    was best handling bike at low speeds
    with the only electric starter in its
    class.
    Suzuki TC-120 had largest engine with
    the most torque, was extremely stable
    for its weight. Voted the best looking
    of the lot by our test crew.
    of the engine’s power over its effective
    operating speeds, stability in various
    dirt maneuvers, effectiveness of front
    and rear suspension, tire size and tread
    patterns, comfort of seating and bars
    in relation to one another, ease of
    locating neutral in transmission, spac-
    ing of transmission ratios, overall
    speed capabilities, price, stopping per-
    formance, and overall finish and detail.
    The Suzuki TC-120 engine had the
    best low-end torque of the lot—not at
    all surprising considering it had about
    20% greater displacement than the
    others. Of the near-lOOcc. three, the
    four-stroke Honda CL-90 had it in
    low-end torque, followed by the
    Hodaka Ace 100, and the Yamaha
    L5-T. The Yamaha’s lack of low-end
    was more than compensated for by its
    best-of-all power spread; you can open
    the throttle on the Yamaha at nearly
    any speed and find ample power. The
    Suzuki was next best in the spread of
    available power, but, in all fairness, it
    was the least broken in of the four and
    its greater displacement-promises more
    response than our test bike offered.
    The Honda and Hodaka had surpris-
    ingly similar ranges of useable power
    for their different engine designs. Pre-
    vious to the test, we felt that near-
    lOOcc. was the absolute minimum
    displacement for a compromise motor-
    cycle like a trailbike. None of the
    machines disappointed us— the combi-
    nation of power available from this
    size engine and the minimal weight of
    a good handling, large-wheeled, motor-
    cycle are combined in each of the four
    bikes we selected for the test.
    The Hodaka was expected to have
    the best handling in the dirt, and the
    Honda the best handling on the street
    and this is just what we found during
    the test. The Yamaha and Suzuki were
    more compromising between dirt and
    street. It is a bit ridiculous to discuss
    any bike’s handling without consider-...
    16653